People v. Fitzpatrick
17 N.Y.S. 951, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 970, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 612
Opinion
On the former application it did not appear that the people had not beten prejudiced by the delay, but, as that fact is now made to appear by the papers submitted on this application, the motion is granted, the forfeiture remitted, and judgment directed to be vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Fitzpatrick, 17 N.Y.S. 951, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 970, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 612 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
17 N.Y.S. 951 (People v. Fitzpatrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.