People v. Fischer

14 Daly 278, 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 382
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedJune 6, 1887
StatusPublished

This text of 14 Daly 278 (People v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fischer, 14 Daly 278, 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 382 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Opinion

Per Curiam. — [Present, Larremore, Ch. J., Allen and Bookstaver, JJ.] —

We fail to see any reason, either in law or equity, why this application should be granted.

Upon the arrest of the accused she gave bail for her appearance, pending an examination, which she forfeited by leaving the county, and the money asked to be returned was paid on this forfeiture. It is true that, after such payment, she returned, and gave bail under the indictment which had been found against her while she was a fugitive, and that this indictment was subsequently nolle prosequied; but that is no reason why the previous forfeiture should be remitted, as the fact of the payment of the $1,000 was probably taken into consideration; and the district attorney may well have regarded that as.a reason moving to the nolle.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Daly 278, 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fischer-nyctcompl-1887.