People v. Fioretti

406 N.E.2d 746, 49 N.Y.2d 976, 428 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2324
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 24, 1980·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered as to appellant for the reasons stated in Part B of the opinion by Mr. Justice J. Irwin Shapiro at the Appellate Division (68 AD2d, at pp 574-578). The trial court having made no meaningful inquiry on the record to ascertain whether appellant was cognizant of the potential risks inherent in his representation by the same counsel as his codefendant, the significant possibility of a conflict of interest arising out of the differing types and quantum of evidence against each, including the disincentive to calling appellant to the stand despite his lack of a criminal record, mandates reversal of his conviction (People v Macerola, 47 NY2d 257; see, also, People v Baffi, 49 NY2d 820).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order reversed and a new trial ordered in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fioretti, 406 N.E.2d 746, 49 N.Y.2d 976, 428 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2324 (N.Y. 1980).

406 N.E.2d 746 (People v. Fioretti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Recupero
535 N.E.2d 287 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Burwell
422 N.E.2d 822 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Ellis
80 A.D.2d 750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Richard MM.
75 A.D.2d 389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
People v. Ortero
75 A.D.2d 168 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)