People v. Fiorello
97 A.D.3d 763, 947 N.Y.2d 909
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 18, 2012·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Inasmuch as “the defendant received the minimum sentence permitted by law, this Court has no authority to reduce [the sentence] as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice” (People v Howard, 50 AD3d 823, 823 [2008]; see CPL 470.20 [6]; Penal Law §§ 70.00 [3] [a] [ii]; 220.41; People v Wilson, 28 AD3d 796, 797 [2006]; People v Muller, 294 AD2d 602 [2002]). Mastro, A.P.J., Rivera, Belen, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Fiorello, 97 A.D.3d 763, 947 N.Y.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
97 A.D.3d 763 (People v. Fiorello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Johnson
2020 NY Slip Op 4323 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Anastasiou
2018 NY Slip Op 4748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Lopez
128 A.D.3d 1093 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Feliciano
111 A.D.3d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
BARBER, STEPHEN M., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
People v. Barber
106 A.D.3d 1533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)