People v. Fiore

11 A.D.2d 974, 209 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8165
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 22, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 A.D.2d 974 (People v. Fiore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fiore, 11 A.D.2d 974, 209 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

Motion to disqualify Paul R. Shanahan, Esq., from appearing for or representing defendant Dennis P, O’Dowd or any other defendant in the above-entitled action, [975]*975denied. Memorandum: We do not believe that it would be appropriate or proper for us to attempt to determine upon the present papers and at this stage of the litigation the propriety of attorney Shanahan’s representation of defendant O’Dowd. All of the defendants have been apprised of the making of this motion, all of their respective attorneys having been served with the motion papers. Although counsel for most of the defendants were present upon the argument of this motion, none other than the attorney for defendant O’Dowd participated in the argument and none made any objection to the representation of defendant O’Dowd by Mr. Shanahan. The affidavits of Mr. Shanahan and defendant O’Dowd clearly show that said defendant has been fully advised of all of the circumstances set forth in the moving papers and further that defendant O’Dowd strongly urges that he be permitted to continue to have Mr. Shanahan represent him. It is to be expected that Mr. Shanahan will scrupulously obey the Canons of Ethics. Of course, we cannot undertake at this time to pass upon the propriety of any particular line of evidence or argument. Under these circumstances and in the present posture of the litigation, the motion to disqualify Mr. Shanahan should be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Vera
49 A.D.2d 883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.2d 974, 209 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fiore-nyappdiv-1960.