People v. Finney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Finney

20 A.D.2d 661, 246 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4535

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 661 (People v. Finney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Finney, 20 A.D.2d 661, 246 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a criminal action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 20, 1963, which denied his motion to obtain a transcript of the stenographic minutes of the trial upon which he was convicted in the former County Court of said county on November 29, 1956. . Appeal dismissed. Defendant has requested that his motion be treated as an application for a writ of error coram nobis, which would make the order appealable. This cannot be done, since the relief sought furnishes no basis for a coram nobis application. The order is not appealable; it does not fall within the limitations and requirements of section 517 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and other applicable provisions of law. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a criminal action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 20, 1963, which denied his motion to obtain a transcript of the stenographic minutes of the trial upon which he was convicted in the former County Court of said county on November 29, 1956. . Appeal dismissed. Defendant has requested that his motion be treated as an application for a writ of error coram nobis, which would make the order appealable. This cannot be done, since the relief sought furnishes no basis for a coram nobis application. The order is not appealable; it does not fall within the limitations and requirements of section 517 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and other applicable provisions of law. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 661, 246 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-finney-nyappdiv-1964.