People v. Finnegan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Finnegan

238 A.D.2d 520, 657 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4015

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 21, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered April 3,1996, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the record, we find no reason to disturb the County Court’s determination denying the defendant’s application for youthful offender treatment, and we decline to vacate the sentence in the interest of justice (see, CPL 720.20; cf., People v Cruickshank, 105 AD2d 325, 333-336, affd sub nom. People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered April 3,1996, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the record, we find no reason to disturb the County Court’s determination denying the defendant’s application for youthful offender treatment, and we decline to vacate the sentence in the interest of justice (see, CPL 720.20; cf., People v Cruickshank, 105 AD2d 325, 333-336, affd sub nom. People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

People v. Finnegan, 238 A.D.2d 520, 657 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

238 A.D.2d 520 (People v. Finnegan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related