People v. Finkelstein

12 A.D.2d 457, 207 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7129
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1960·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgments of conviction unanimously affirmed. It is not clear that People v. Engel (7 N Y 2d 1002) determined that section 1141 of the Penal Law in its present form is unconstitutional. The decision is supportable by the absence in that case of any proof which would supply the element of scienter. In the absence of further clarification by the highest court of the State the statute may be construed to require scienter and thus satisfy the requirements laid down in Smith v. California (361 U. S. 147). People v. Shapiro (6 A D 2d 271) is not dispositive of the question before this court because the decision is not controlling in this Department and because the decision is not one in the highest court of the State (cf. Smith v. California, supra, p. 149, especially footnote 2). Assuming the validity of the statute the books in question come under its condemnation. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Finkelstein, 12 A.D.2d 457, 207 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

12 A.D.2d 457 (People v. Finkelstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shearson Lehman Bros. v. M & L Investments
10 F.3d 1510 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. v. M & L Investments
10 F.3d 1510 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)