People v. Finger

140 A.D.2d 453, 528 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4911

This text of 140 A.D.2d 453 (People v. Finger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Finger, 140 A.D.2d 453, 528 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

In our opinion, the circumstances of this case warrant the exercise of our discretion so as to modify the sentence with respect to the term of imprisonment. "While concededly death eventually claims everyone, the innocent as well as the guilty, such truism should never deter this court from setting aside a term of imprisonment where it is manifest that incarceration would hasten the death of a defendant, yet confer little or no benefit upon the general public” (People v Notey, 72 AD2d 279, 285). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Notey
72 A.D.2d 279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.2d 453, 528 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-finger-nyappdiv-1988.