People v. Filiano
This text of 221 A.D.2d 361 (People v. Filiano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), rendered June 15, 1994, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support a finding that she had knowledge of the weight of the controlled substance is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Lawrence, 85 NY2d 1002; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Joy, J. P., Hart, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 A.D.2d 361, 635 N.Y.S.2d 472, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-filiano-nyappdiv-1995.