People v. Figueroa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Figueroa

2017 NY Slip Op 7418, 154 A.D.3d 593, 62 N.Y.S.3d 274

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 2017

Docket4802 2506/10 5051/10

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 7418 (People v. Figueroa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Figueroa, 2017 NY Slip Op 7418, 154 A.D.3d 593, 62 N.Y.S.3d 274 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), entered on or about April 11, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The level three adjudication was appropriate, and there is no basis for a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or were outweighed by the aggravating factors. Defendant’s course of sexual conduct against a very young child, and his involvement with child pornography, support the conclusion that he poses a threat to re-offend children.

Concur— Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Gesmer and Kern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), entered on or about April 11, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The level three adjudication was appropriate, and there is no basis for a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or were outweighed by the aggravating factors. Defendant’s course of sexual conduct against a very young child, and his involvement with child pornography, support the conclusion that he poses a threat to re-offend children.

Concur— Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Gesmer and Kern, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 7418, 154 A.D.3d 593, 62 N.Y.S.3d 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-figueroa-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack