People v. Figueroa
68 A.D.3d 1013, 889 N.Y.2d 856
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Figueroa. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 A.D.3d 458 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 2009·Published
Opinion
Upon this Court’s independent review of the record, we conclude that nonfrivolous issues exist, including, but not limited to, whether the sentencing court abided by the sentencing promise made at the time of the entry of the plea of guilty. Accordingly, assignment of new counsel is warranted (see People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633, 638 [2001]; People v Vasquez, 70 NY2d 1, 4 [1987]). Skelos, J.E, Florio, Balkin, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Figueroa, 68 A.D.3d 1013, 889 N.Y.2d 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
68 A.D.3d 1013 (People v. Figueroa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Vasquez
509 N.E.2d 934 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)