People v. Figueroa

465 N.E.2d 356, 62 N.Y.2d 727, 476 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4328
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 8, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 465 N.E.2d 356 (People v. Figueroa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Figueroa, 465 N.E.2d 356, 62 N.Y.2d 727, 476 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4328 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The appeal should be dismissed.

The Appellate Division reversed because it concluded that the People were obligated to produce the undercover officer at the hearing in order to establish probable cause for the defendant’s arrest. However, in view of the fact that this defendant never raised that issue at the hearing, the Appellate Division’s determination was necessarily made as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15, subd 3, par [c]) and thus is not appealable to this [729]*729court (CPL 450.90, subd 2, par [a]; People v Fava, 58 NY2d 807; see, also, People v Dercole, 52 NY2d 956).

Appeal dismissed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Figueroa
111 A.D.2d 406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
465 N.E.2d 356, 62 N.Y.2d 727, 476 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-figueroa-ny-1984.