People v. Figueroa

465 N.E.2d 356, 62 N.Y.2d 727, 476 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4328
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 8, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The appeal should be dismissed.

The Appellate Division reversed because it concluded that the People were obligated to produce the undercover officer at the hearing in order to establish probable cause for the defendant’s arrest. However, in view of the fact that this defendant never raised that issue at the hearing, the Appellate Division’s determination was necessarily made as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15, subd 3, par [c]) and thus is not appealable to this [729] court (CPL 450.90, subd 2, par [a]; People v Fava, 58 NY2d 807; see, also, People v Dercole, 52 NY2d 956).

Appeal dismissed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Figueroa, 465 N.E.2d 356, 62 N.Y.2d 727, 476 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4328 (N.Y. 1984).

465 N.E.2d 356 (People v. Figueroa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Figueroa
111 A.D.2d 406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)