People v. Figueora

43 A.D.2d 648, 349 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3088
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 1973
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 43 A.D.2d 648 (People v. Figueora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Figueora, 43 A.D.2d 648, 349 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3088 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County, rendered July 31,1972 upon a verdict convicting defendant of two counts of criminally selling a dangerous drug in the third degree in violation of section 220.35 of the Penal Law. Testimony was adduced at the trial that the defendant had sold heroin to a police officer at two different times on September 28, 1971. Among other things, the defendant contends that the bail provisions of CPL article 500 are unconstitutional and that the trial court erred in -permitting an in-court identification of him since there was evidence that the person making the identification had seen him in two suggestive appearances some months after the crime had occurred. The constitutionality of CPL article 500 has been upheld by the Court of Appeals in the case of Bellamy v. Judges & Justices in N. Y. City Grim. Gt. (32 N Y 2d 886).. The defendant does not contend that the trial court abused its discretion in arriving at the amount of bail and the record does not disclose any facts and circumstances which would Support a finding of discrimination as to this defendant. The record discloses that the police officer who purchased the drugs from the defendant had ample opportunity to observe him in. face-to-face confrontations at the time of the sales and that the in-court identification was not affected by the inadvertent observations of the defendant by that witness at times after his arrest. The remaining issues pressed by the defendant are without merit. Judgment affirmed. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Cooke, Sweeney and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Burton
150 Misc. 2d 214 (New York Supreme Court, 1990)
People v. Lewis
57 A.D.2d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 A.D.2d 648, 349 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-figueora-nyappdiv-1973.