People v. Fierro

190 N.Y.S.3d 164, 217 A.D.3d 964, 2023 NY Slip Op 03475
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 28, 2023
DocketInd. No. 2096/20
StatusPublished

This text of 190 N.Y.S.3d 164 (People v. Fierro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fierro, 190 N.Y.S.3d 164, 217 A.D.3d 964, 2023 NY Slip Op 03475 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Fierro (2023 NY Slip Op 03475)
People v Fierro
2023 NY Slip Op 03475
Decided on June 28, 2023
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 28, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
LARA J. GENOVESI
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.

2022-01608
(Ind. No. 2096/20)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Alfredo Fierro, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Tammy E. Linn of counsel; Russ Altman-Merino on the memorandum), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Melissa Wachs of counsel; Karen Abel-Bey on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jane Tully, J.), imposed February 24, 2022, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 340-342; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257; People v Diaz, 169 AD3d 1059). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Morrow, 198 AD3d 922, 923).

DILLON, J.P., IANNACCI, GENOVESI and WAN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Matthews
2021 NY Slip Op 05723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 N.Y.S.3d 164, 217 A.D.3d 964, 2023 NY Slip Op 03475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fierro-nyappdiv-2023.