People v. Fields

101 A.D.3d 1043, 955 N.Y.2d 522
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 2012·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The defendant contends that the County Court erred in setting, without a hearing, the amount of restitution he was required to pay. However, since the defendant failed to request a restitution hearing and did not object to the amount of restitution he was required to pay, his present claim regarding the amount of restitution imposed is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Horne, 97 NY2d 404, 414 n 3 [2002]; People v Francis, 82 AD3d 1263 [2011]; People v Nelson, 77 AD3d 973 [2010]; People v Harris, 72 AD3d 1110, 1112 [2010]), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Dillon, J.P., Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fields, 101 A.D.3d 1043, 955 N.Y.2d 522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

101 A.D.3d 1043 (People v. Fields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Chung
184 N.Y.S.3d 141 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Finnegan
112 A.D.3d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Jerome
110 A.D.3d 739 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Woods
110 A.D.3d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)