People v. Fields

215 A.D.2d 775, 627 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5710
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 30, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered January 11, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention regarding the inadequacy of the court’s adverse inference charge, imposed as a sanction for the [776]*776loss of Rosario material, is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Roe, 196 AD2d 899, 900; People v Thomas, 50 NY2d 467) and, in any event, without merit (see, People v Martinez, 71 NY2d 937).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, O’Brien and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fields, 215 A.D.2d 775, 627 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

215 A.D.2d 775 (People v. Fields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gardner
307 A.D.2d 367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Walker
256 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Fullwood
254 A.D.2d 431 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)