People v. Fields

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fields

111 A.D.2d 931, 491 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50201

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.2d 931 (People v. Fields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fields, 111 A.D.2d 931, 491 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50201 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.), rendered October 1, 1981, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, attempted petit larceny, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and criminal possession of a hypodermic instrument (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant was properly convicted of burglary in the second degree. Reading the court’s charge in its entirety, we conclude that the jury was properly instructed on the law regarding both first and second degree burglary. Further, a reading of the record also shows that no violation of the trial court’s suppression order occurred during the testimony of the arresting officer. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.), rendered October 1, 1981, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, attempted petit larceny, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and criminal possession of a hypodermic instrument (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant was properly convicted of burglary in the second degree. Reading the court’s charge in its entirety, we conclude that the jury was properly instructed on the law regarding both first and second degree burglary. Further, a reading of the record also shows that no violation of the trial court’s suppression order occurred during the testimony of the arresting officer. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.2d 931, 491 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fields-nyappdiv-1985.