People v. Fiduciary Capital Corp. of Delaware

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fiduciary Capital Corp. of Delaware

43 A.D.2d 553, 349 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3035

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.2d 553 (People v. Fiduciary Capital Corp. of Delaware) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fiduciary Capital Corp. of Delaware, 43 A.D.2d 553, 349 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3035 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County entered March 19, 1973, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to provide that as a condition of the broadening of the scope of the issues to be tried before the Referee, the defendant-appellant shall have the opportunity for further examination of the witnesses theretofore produced at the hearings on the additional issues to be tried, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The Attorney-General in this proceeding under article 23-A of the General Business Law, based on information developed at the hearings already held, has, by obtaining subsequent broadening of the issues, received the equivalent of permission to amend his complaint. Under the circumstances, the defendant-appellant should be permitted in his defense against the new issues tendered, further to examine those witnesses who have already testified. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Kupferman, Murphy and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County entered March 19, 1973, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to provide that as a condition of the broadening of the scope of the issues to be tried before the Referee, the defendant-appellant shall have the opportunity for further examination of the witnesses theretofore produced at the hearings on the additional issues to be tried, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The Attorney-General in this proceeding under article 23-A of the General Business Law, based on information developed at the hearings already held, has, by obtaining subsequent broadening of the issues, received the equivalent of permission to amend his complaint. Under the circumstances, the defendant-appellant should be permitted in his defense against the new issues tendered, further to examine those witnesses who have already testified. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Kupferman, Murphy and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.2d 553, 349 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fiduciary-capital-corp-of-delaware-nyappdiv-1973.