People v. Ferrin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ferrin

57 A.D.2d 559, 393 N.Y.S.2d 83, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11516

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 A.D.2d 559 (People v. Ferrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ferrin, 57 A.D.2d 559, 393 N.Y.S.2d 83, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11516 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Consolidated appeals by defendant (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 18, 1974, convicting him of murder, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) by permission, from an order of the same court, dated September 7, 1976, which, after a hearing, denied his application to vacate the judgment of conviction and order a new trial on the ground that he was mentally incompetent at the time of trial. Judgment and order affirmed. There is no proof to indicate that defendant was not competent to stand trial. If any error was committed at the trial, it could not, under the facts in this record, have been reversible as the proof of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Margett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consolidated appeals by defendant (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered April 18, 1974, convicting him of murder, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) by permission, from an order of the same court, dated September 7, 1976, which, after a hearing, denied his application to vacate the judgment of conviction and order a new trial on the ground that he was mentally incompetent at the time of trial. Judgment and order affirmed. There is no proof to indicate that defendant was not competent to stand trial. If any error was committed at the trial, it could not, under the facts in this record, have been reversible as the proof of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Margett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 559, 393 N.Y.S.2d 83, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ferrin-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack