People v. Ferrazzano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ferrazzano

52 A.D.2d 629, 383 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12265

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 629 (People v. Ferrazzano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ferrazzano, 52 A.D.2d 629, 383 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12265 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 12, 1975, which, after a hearing, granted the branch of defendants’ motion which sought to suppress physical evidence. Order affirmed. We agree with the'trial court’s conclusion that, on the facts found by it, the observations of the investigator, acting on the basis of information received anonymously by someone in his office 10 days before, did not have probable cause to seize the packages (see People v Vassallo, 46 AD2d 781; People v Bruno, 45 AD2d 1025; People v Rizzo, 47 AD2d 468; People v Pepitone, 48 AD2d 135). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Rabin, Shapiro, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 12, 1975, which, after a hearing, granted the branch of defendants’ motion which sought to suppress physical evidence. Order affirmed. We agree with the'trial court’s conclusion that, on the facts found by it, the observations of the investigator, acting on the basis of information received anonymously by someone in his office 10 days before, did not have probable cause to seize the packages (see People v Vassallo, 46 AD2d 781; People v Bruno, 45 AD2d 1025; People v Rizzo, 47 AD2d 468; People v Pepitone, 48 AD2d 135). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Rabin, Shapiro, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 629, 383 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ferrazzano-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack