People v. Ferratto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ferratto

278 A.D.2d 744, 718 N.Y.S.2d 656, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13962

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 744 (People v. Ferratto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ferratto, 278 A.D.2d 744, 718 N.Y.S.2d 656, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered June 1, 1999, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced to lifetime probation. Thereafter, defendant pleaded guilty to violating the terms and conditions of his probation. Defendant’s [745]*745probation was revoked and he was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 5 to 10 years.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, defense counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submissions, we agree. Defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a more favorable sentence than that reached as part of the plea bargain. Accordingly, the judgment, of conviction is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.), rendered June 1, 1999, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced to lifetime probation. Thereafter, defendant pleaded guilty to violating the terms and conditions of his probation. Defendant’s [745]*745probation was revoked and he was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 5 to 10 years.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, defense counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submissions, we agree. Defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty and was sentenced as a second felony offender to a more favorable sentence than that reached as part of the plea bargain. Accordingly, the judgment, of conviction is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 744, 718 N.Y.S.2d 656, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ferratto-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack