People v. Fernandez

2018 NY Slip Op 8952
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Fernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 A.D.3d 1052
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 26, 2018·No. 2017-00763·Published

Opinion

People v Fernandez (2018 NY Slip Op 08952)
People v Fernandez
2018 NY Slip Op 08952
Decided on December 26, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 26, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
SANDRA L. SGROI
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2017-00763
(Ind. No. 789/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Mauricio Fernandez, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Caitlin Halpern of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Roni C. Piplani of counsel; Deanna Russo on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Suzanne J. Melendez, J.), imposed June 3, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid because the Supreme Court's colloquy conflated the right to appeal with the rights that are automatically forfeited on a plea of guilty (see People v Johnson, 165 AD3d 702; People v Glover, 164 AD3d 1259; People v Cardiello, 164 AD3d 1254; see generally People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264). Further, although the defendant executed a written appeal waiver form, the court did not ascertain on the record whether the defendant had signed or read the waiver, or discussed it with defense counsel (see People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283; People v Cardiello, 164 AD3d 1254; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 145). Thus, the waiver does not preclude review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim.

However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

RIVERA, J.P., SGROI, HINDS-RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fernandez, 2018 NY Slip Op 8952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 8952 (People v. Fernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)