Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Fernandez

People v. Fernandez

277 A.D.2d 327, 715 N.Y.S.2d 886, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11786
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Fernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 263 A.D.2d 673 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2000·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered October 19, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance near school grounds, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s claim, the Sandoval ruling was proper in light of the defendant’s extensive criminal history (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371; People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455; People v Mattiace, 77 NY2d 269; People v McClam, 225 AD2d 799).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Altman, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fernandez, 277 A.D.2d 327, 715 N.Y.S.2d 886, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

277 A.D.2d 327 (People v. Fernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Sandoval
314 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Mattiace
568 N.E.2d 1189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. McClam
225 A.D.2d 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)