People v. Fernandez
124 A.D.2d 746, 507 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62046
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Fernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 A.D.2d 867 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 1986·Published
Opinion
The evidence adduced at the suppression hearing was sufficient to find that the defendant voluntarily and knowingly offered his confession after having been advised of his rights and waiving those rights (see, Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 475). The totality of the circumstances surrounding the confession indicates that the defendant understood the Miranda warnings and expressly waived them (see, North Carolina v Butler, 441 US 369). Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Hooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Fernandez, 124 A.D.2d 746, 507 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
124 A.D.2d 746 (People v. Fernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)
North Carolina v. Butler
441 U.S. 369 (Supreme Court, 1979)