People v. Ferguson

2019 NY Slip Op 1910
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 2019
Docket202 KA 16-00636
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1910 (People v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ferguson, 2019 NY Slip Op 1910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Ferguson (2019 NY Slip Op 01910)
People v Ferguson
2019 NY Slip Op 01910
Decided on March 15, 2019
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 15, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

202 KA 16-00636

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

THERESA A. FERGUSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


KATHLEEN A. KUGLER, CONFLICT DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JESSICA J. BURGASSER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

CAROLINE A. WOJTASZEK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J. Murphy, III, J.), rendered March 29, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of criminal sexual act in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of criminal sexual act in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.40 [2]). The record establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence (see id. at 255; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; cf. People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928 [2012]).

Entered: March 15, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Maracle
973 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 1910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ferguson-nyappdiv-2019.