People v. Ferguson

72 A.D.3d 541, 898 N.Y.S.2d 837
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ferguson. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 A.D.3d 571

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berk-man, J), rendered November 14, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The jury reasonably could have concluded from a store employee’s testimony that defendant intentionally assisted the codefendant in stealing merchandise, and discredited the testimony of a defense witness that defendant did no more than unwittingly accompany the witness on a shoplifting expedition. [542]*542Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Saxe, Nardelli, McGuire and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ferguson, 72 A.D.3d 541, 898 N.Y.S.2d 837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

72 A.D.3d 541 (People v. Ferguson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)