People v. Ferguson

240 A.D.2d 199, 658 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6159
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ferguson. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 A.D.2d 187

Opinion

Judgment, [200]*200Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered February 2, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 81/s to 25 years, 121/2 to 25 years, -5 to 15 years and 5 to 15 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to adjourn this short trial until the following week to await the appearance of a defense witness who had already been absent, without explanation, for two days. There was no reliable indication that the witness would ever appear or that the witness’s testimony would be of any benefit to defendant (People v Hunt, 235 AD2d 374).

Defendant’s challenges to the prosecutor’s summation remarks are unpreserved, and are without merit since the challenged remarks were proper comments on issues of credibility and fair responses to defendant’s summation.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ferguson, 240 A.D.2d 199, 658 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 199 (People v. Ferguson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hunt
235 A.D.2d 374 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)