People v. Ferguson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ferguson

40 A.D.2d 529, 335 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4053

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 529 (People v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ferguson, 40 A.D.2d 529, 335 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4053 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 13, 1971, affirmed. Although we believe the prosecutor acted improperly in answering an alleged attack upon his integrity during summation, and that some of the statements of the Trial Justice in answer to objections and a request could well have been tempered, we do not deem the remarks to have been prejudicial upon this record. Rabin, P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 13, 1971, affirmed. Although we believe the prosecutor acted improperly in answering an alleged attack upon his integrity during summation, and that some of the statements of the Trial Justice in answer to objections and a request could well have been tempered, we do not deem the remarks to have been prejudicial upon this record. Rabin, P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 529, 335 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ferguson-nyappdiv-1972.