People v. Ferguson

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Ferguson

215 N.W.2d 782, 51 Mich. App. 446, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 930

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 1, 1974

DocketDocket No. 13564

StatusPublished

This text of 215 N.W.2d 782 (People v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ferguson, 215 N.W.2d 782, 51 Mich. App. 446, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 930 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

[447]*447On Remand

Lesinski, C. J.

This cause was remanded to our Court by order of the Supreme Court dated November 29, 1973, for reconsideration in light of People v Chism, 390 Mich 104; 211 NW2d 193 (1973). The first decision by this Court was rendered March 28, 1973, and is reported at 45 Mich App 697; 206 NW2d 812 (1973).

The Court upon remand has reconsidered the merits of the cause in view of People v Chism and does hereby set aside its order reversing defendant’s conviction on the charge of statutory rape, MCLA 750.520; MSA 28.788.

Chism, supra, decided in October of 1973, holds that in the absence of request or proper objection under present case law, there is no absolute requirement that the trial judge give limiting instructions, even though such instructions should have been given. Thus, where there is no objection to failure to instruct, no reversible error is committed.

No limiting instruction was either requested or given in this case. Chism controls and defendant’s conviction of statutory rape is hereby affirmed.

Chism has no bearing on our holding that defendant’s conviction on the charge of gross indecency, MCLA 750.338b; MSA 28.570(2), must be reversed. Therefore, defendant’s conviction on this count stands reversed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI