People v. Ferguson

13 Ill. App. 329, 1883 Ill. App. LEXIS 58
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJune 27, 1883
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ill. App. 329 (People v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ferguson, 13 Ill. App. 329, 1883 Ill. App. LEXIS 58 (Ill. Ct. App. 1883).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A petition was filed in the county court by Mrs. Irwin, praying the court to make an order requiring the administrator of her deceased husband to deliver to her certain stocks and moneys in his hands, to which she claimed to be entitled under the will of the said Robert Irwin.

The county court on the hearing of the cause refused the order, from which she appealed to the circuit court, where the order of the county court was affirmed, from which latter judgment she appeals to this court.

There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and we must presume, nothing appearing to the contrary, that the evidence before the court justified its action: John C. Choate v. Mark Hathaway, 73 Ill. 518.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Choate v. Hathaway
73 Ill. 518 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Ill. App. 329, 1883 Ill. App. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ferguson-illappct-1883.