People v. Fenti
This text of 136 A.D.2d 944 (People v. Fenti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to CPL 30.30. The period from July 2, 1985 to October 15, 1985 was properly excluded. The record clearly establishes that defendant either requested or consented to adjournments in City Court for plea negotiations during that time (see, CPL 30.30 [4] [b]; People v Meierdiercks, 68 NY2d 613; People v Worley, 66 NY2d 523, 527). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J.—grand larceny, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Den-man, Green and Pine, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 A.D.2d 944, 525 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fenti-nyappdiv-1988.