People v. Fenti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fenti

136 A.D.2d 944, 525 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1469

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 29, 1988·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to CPL 30.30. The period from July 2, 1985 to October 15, 1985 was properly excluded. The record clearly establishes that defendant either requested or consented to adjournments in City Court for plea negotiations during that time (see, CPL 30.30 [4] [b]; People v Meierdiercks, 68 NY2d 613; People v Worley, 66 NY2d 523, 527). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J.—grand larceny, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Den-man, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to CPL 30.30. The period from July 2, 1985 to October 15, 1985 was properly excluded. The record clearly establishes that defendant either requested or consented to adjournments in City Court for plea negotiations during that time (see, CPL 30.30 [4] [b]; People v Meierdiercks, 68 NY2d 613; People v Worley, 66 NY2d 523, 527). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Wisner, J.—grand larceny, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Den-man, Green and Pine, JJ.

People v. Fenti, 136 A.D.2d 944, 525 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

136 A.D.2d 944 (People v. Fenti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related