People v. Felong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Felong

283 A.D.2d 951, 724 N.Y.S.2d 380, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4630

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 283 A.D.2d 951 (People v. Felong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Felong, 283 A.D.2d 951, 724 N.Y.S.2d 380, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.25) and attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 155.30 [1]). Defendant contends that County Court erred in failing to dismiss a juror after the juror reported to the court that she recognized a prosecution witness as a friend of her mother. By failing to object to the manner in which the court investigated whether the juror should be dismissed as grossly unqualified, defendant has failed to preserve his contention for our review (see, People v Albert, 85 NY2d 851, 852). In any event, that contention is without merit. The juror unequivocally stated that her limited association with the witness would not affect her ability to consider the evidence impartially (see, People v Brantley, 168 AD2d 949, lv denied 77 NY2d 904).

[952]*952The court properly denied defendant’s request to subpoena the psychiatric records of a key prosecution witness. “Confidential psychiatric records should be disclosed ‘only when their confidentiality is significantly outweighed by the interests of justice’ ” (People v Toledo, 270 AD2d 805, 806, lv denied 95 NY2d 858, quoting People v Brooks, 199 AD2d 275, lv denied 82 NY2d 922; see, Mental Hygiene Law § 33.13 [c] [1]), and defendant’s allegation that the records could impact upon the credibility of the witness failed to meet that test. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions with respect to the court’s denial of defendant’s request for the subpoena and conclude that they are without merit. The verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Geraci, Jr., J. — Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Wisner, Scudder and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.25) and attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 155.30 [1]). Defendant contends that County Court erred in failing to dismiss a juror after the juror reported to the court that she recognized a prosecution witness as a friend of her mother. By failing to object to the manner in which the court investigated whether the juror should be dismissed as grossly unqualified, defendant has failed to preserve his contention for our review (see, People v Albert, 85 NY2d 851, 852). In any event, that contention is without merit. The juror unequivocally stated that her limited association with the witness would not affect her ability to consider the evidence impartially (see, People v Brantley, 168 AD2d 949, lv denied 77 NY2d 904).

[952]*952The court properly denied defendant’s request to subpoena the psychiatric records of a key prosecution witness. “Confidential psychiatric records should be disclosed ‘only when their confidentiality is significantly outweighed by the interests of justice’ ” (People v Toledo, 270 AD2d 805, 806, lv denied 95 NY2d 858, quoting People v Brooks, 199 AD2d 275, lv denied 82 NY2d 922; see, Mental Hygiene Law § 33.13 [c] [1]), and defendant’s allegation that the records could impact upon the credibility of the witness failed to meet that test. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions with respect to the court’s denial of defendant’s request for the subpoena and conclude that they are without merit. The verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Geraci, Jr., J. — Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Wisner, Scudder and Burns, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D.2d 951, 724 N.Y.S.2d 380, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-felong-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack