People v. Felix

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Felix

219 A.D.2d 515, 631 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9530

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 21, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 A.D.2d 515 (People v. Felix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Felix, 219 A.D.2d 515, 631 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obus, J.), rendered June 9, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 41/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewed in a light most favorable to the People, the trial testimony of the detectives who participated in the buy-and-bust operation that resulted in defendant’s arrest establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932). The inconsistencies in their testimony were minor and properly placed before the jury whose evaluation and resolution of same cannot be held to be "manifestly erroneous” (People v Corporan, 169 AD2d 643). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obus, J.), rendered June 9, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 41/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewed in a light most favorable to the People, the trial testimony of the detectives who participated in the buy-and-bust operation that resulted in defendant’s arrest establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932). The inconsistencies in their testimony were minor and properly placed before the jury whose evaluation and resolution of same cannot be held to be "manifestly erroneous” (People v Corporan, 169 AD2d 643). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D.2d 515, 631 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-felix-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack