People v. Feliciano
This text of 127 A.D.3d 1228 (People v. Feliciano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McCann, J.), imposed October 5, 2011, which, upon the granting of his motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside *1229 a sentence of the same court (Hanophy, J.), imposed January 13, 2006, upon his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, resentenced him as a second felony offender.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the resentencing court did not fail to independently exercise its discretion to determine an appropriate sentence (see People v Iliff, 115 AD3d 764 [2014]; People v Seymour, 21 AD3d 1292 [2005]; cf. People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302 [1981]). Taking into account all of the relevant circumstances, the resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Ortiz, 84 AD3d 1118 [2011]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 A.D.3d 1228, 5 N.Y.S.3d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-feliciano-nyappdiv-2015.