People v. Feliciano

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Feliciano

2 N.E.3d 921, 22 N.Y.3d 986

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 21, 2013

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 N.E.3d 921 (People v. Feliciano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Feliciano, 2 N.E.3d 921, 22 N.Y.3d 986 (N.Y. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that he completed the terms of his original plea agreement and was therefore entitled to dismissal of the indictment is not preserved for our review. Upon his discharge, defendant did not move for dismissal following the events that he now says constituted performance of the agreement.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI