People v. Feliciano

2 N.E.3d 921, 22 N.Y.3d 986
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 2013·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that he completed the terms of his original plea agreement and was therefore entitled to dismissal of the indictment is not preserved for our review. Upon his discharge, defendant did not move for dismissal following the events that he now says constituted performance of the agreement.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Feliciano, 2 N.E.3d 921, 22 N.Y.3d 986 (N.Y. 2013).

2 N.E.3d 921 (People v. Feliciano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Oliver
2018 NY Slip Op 4349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Pollard
132 A.D.3d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)