People v. Feldman

268 A.D. 29, 48 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3099

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Though the defendant consented to a trial by a particular Magistrate holding a Court of Special Sessions, he could not, without his further consent, be tried by another Magistrate sitting in the same Magistrate’s district court. (People v. Geltman, 267 App. Div. 83.) Accordingly, the judgment of conviction should be reversed, the fine returned and the case remitted to the Magistrate’s Court for further proceedings as provided in section 131 of the New York City Criminal Courts Act.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed, the fine returned and the case remitted to the Magistrate’s Court for further proceedings as provided in section 131 of the New York City Criminal Courts Act. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Feldman, 268 A.D. 29, 48 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

268 A.D. 29 (People v. Feldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Geltman
267 A.D. 83 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)