People v. Feldman

268 A.D. 29, 48 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3099

This text of 268 A.D. 29 (People v. Feldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Feldman, 268 A.D. 29, 48 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Though the defendant consented to a trial by a particular Magistrate holding a Court of Special Sessions, he could not, without his further consent, be tried by another Magistrate sitting in the same Magistrate’s district court. (People v. Geltman, 267 App. Div. 83.) Accordingly, the judgment of conviction should be reversed, the fine returned and the case remitted to the Magistrate’s Court for further proceedings as provided in section 131 of the New York City Criminal Courts Act.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed, the fine returned and the case remitted to the Magistrate’s Court for further proceedings as provided in section 131 of the New York City Criminal Courts Act. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Geltman
267 A.D. 83 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D. 29, 48 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-feldman-nyappdiv-1944.