People v. Felder

192 A.D.2d 1111, 598 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4132
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Felder. Read the opinion of the Court — 201 A.D.2d 884

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court properly exercised its discretion in permitting cross-examination of defendant regarding two felony convictions and two misdemeanor convictions. The court reduced the possibility of prejudice by precluding the prosecutor from disclosing the nature and underlying facts of the crimes (see, People v Marr, 177 AD2d 964, 965).

Defendant’s remaining contentions that the court erred in admitting improper bolstering testimony and in instructing the jury regarding reasonable doubt were not preserved for review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hill, 154 AD2d 887, lv denied 75 NY2d 813; People v Moore, 105 AD2d 853), and review in the interest of justice is not warranted. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Sirkin, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Felder, 192 A.D.2d 1111, 598 N.Y.S.2d 747, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

192 A.D.2d 1111 (People v. Felder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Moore
105 A.D.2d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Hill
154 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Marr
177 A.D.2d 964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)