People v. Felder

337 N.E.2d 606, 37 N.Y.2d 779, 375 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2147
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 10, 1975·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Memorandum. While we would affirm the order of the Appellate Division, we disagree with the view taken by the majority of that court that certain testimony was hearsay.

The testimony given by Brunson, the victim of this assault and attempted robbery, to the effect that a bystander stated, when the defendant approached Brunson, that "this Joe is going to take your money” was not hearsay; The testimony was offered not to establish the truth or falsity of the statement, but simply for the purpose of showing that the statement was made. (Richardson, Evidence [10th ed], § 203; McCormick, Evidence [2d ed], § 249, p 588.) The testimony was [781]*781clearly relevant in that it served to explain Brunson’s otherwise irrational conduct in jumping on the table and running away from the premises.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Felder, 337 N.E.2d 606, 37 N.Y.2d 779, 375 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2147 (N.Y. 1975).

337 N.E.2d 606 (People v. Felder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Alman
2020 NY Slip Op 1628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
In re Noemi D.
43 A.D.3d 1303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Mateo v. Tuttle
26 A.D.3d 731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Thomas
824 N.E.2d 499 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
People v. King
141 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Doreen J. v. Thomas John F.
101 A.D.2d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)