People v. Fein

225 N.E.2d 567, 19 N.Y.2d 691
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 1967·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to further amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be further amended by adding thereto the following. Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that the order of the trial court, subjecting him to a trial before a special jury rather than a general jury, denied him a fair trial and deprived him of due process and the equal protection of the laws. The Court of Appeals held that appellant’s constitutional rights were not violated and that former section 749-aa of the Judiciary Law authorizing such a trial is constitutional. [See 18 N Y 2d 162, 722, cert. den. 385 U. S. 649.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fein, 225 N.E.2d 567, 19 N.Y.2d 691 (N.Y. 1967).

225 N.E.2d 567 (People v. Fein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Briggs
342 N.E.2d 557 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)