People v. Fehely

California Supreme Court

People v. Fehely

1 Cal. Unrep. 38

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 18, 1856

DocketNo. 1180

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 38 (People v. Fehely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fehely, 1 Cal. Unrep. 38 (Cal. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

HEYDENFELDT, J.

— There is nothing in the exceptions taken by the appellant which warrants the reversal of the judgment. The second instruction asked for by the defendant might have been given as asked, but the very same in[39]*39struction was given by the eourt in its subsequent charge to' the jury, and almost in the words asked. In such cases we have always refused to reverse upon that ground. The charge of the court is full and explicit as to every point which arose in the case, and is without legal objection.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur: Murray, C. J.; Terry, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HEYDENFELDT, J.

— There is nothing in the exceptions taken by the appellant which warrants the reversal of the judgment. The second instruction asked for by the defendant might have been given as asked, but the very same in[39]*39struction was given by the eourt in its subsequent charge to' the jury, and almost in the words asked. In such cases we have always refused to reverse upon that ground. The charge of the court is full and explicit as to every point which arose in the case, and is without legal objection.

Judgment affirmed.

We concur: Murray, C. J.; Terry, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cal. Unrep. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fehely-cal-1856.