People v. Fecu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fecu

61 A.D.3d 991, 876 N.Y.S.2d 899

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 A.D.3d 991 (People v. Fecu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fecu, 61 A.D.3d 991, 876 N.Y.S.2d 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered September 19, 2006, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the validity of his plea of guilty is not preserved for appellate review because he did not move to withdraw the plea (see People v Clarke, 93 NY2d 904, 906 [1999]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]). In any event, his contentions are without merit (see People v Akhtar, 13 AD3d 383, 383-384 [2004]; cf. Innes v Dalsheim, 864 F2d 974 [1988], cert denied 493 US 809 [1989]). Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered September 19, 2006, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the validity of his plea of guilty is not preserved for appellate review because he did not move to withdraw the plea (see People v Clarke, 93 NY2d 904, 906 [1999]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]). In any event, his contentions are without merit (see People v Akhtar, 13 AD3d 383, 383-384 [2004]; cf. Innes v Dalsheim, 864 F2d 974 [1988], cert denied 493 US 809 [1989]). Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.3d 991, 876 N.Y.S.2d 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fecu-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack