People v. Febles

180 A.D.2d 694

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cirigliano, J.), rendered October 12, 1989, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and crimi[695]*695nal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On appeal, the defendant contends that certain remarks made by the prosecutor during opening and summation deprived him of fair trial. These contentions are not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818; People v Booth, 177 AD2d 495), and in any event, the alleged errors do not warrant reversal of the judgment of conviction in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 399; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242; People v Kline, 175 AD2d 266). Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Rosenblatt and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Febles, 180 A.D.2d 694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

180 A.D.2d 694 (People v. Febles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Galloway
430 N.E.2d 885 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Nuccie
441 N.E.2d 1111 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Kline
175 A.D.2d 266 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Booth
177 A.D.2d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)