People v. Fazio
199 N.E.2d 162, 14 N.Y.2d 716, 250 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1202
This text of 199 N.E.2d 162 (People v. Fazio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Fazio, 199 N.E.2d 162, 14 N.Y.2d 716, 250 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1202 (N.Y. 1964).
Opinion
Order affirmed upon the ground that, unlike People v. Mangi (10 N Y 2d 86), it was not the District Attorney who prevented the accomplice witness from fully explaining his motive for offering testimony that implicated defendant in the crime for which he was convicted.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States of America Ex Rel. Angelo Fazio v. Honorable Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New York
348 F.2d 418 (Second Circuit, 1965)
United States ex rel. Fazio v. Fay
236 F. Supp. 211 (S.D. New York, 1964)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
199 N.E.2d 162, 14 N.Y.2d 716, 250 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fazio-ny-1964.