People v. Fazio
199 N.E.2d 162, 14 N.Y.2d 716, 250 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1202
Opinion
Order affirmed upon the ground that, unlike People v. Mangi (10 N Y 2d 86), it was not the District Attorney who prevented the accomplice witness from fully explaining his motive for offering testimony that implicated defendant in the crime for which he was convicted.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Fazio, 199 N.E.2d 162, 14 N.Y.2d 716, 250 N.Y.S.2d 62, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1202 (N.Y. 1964).
199 N.E.2d 162 (People v. Fazio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States of America Ex Rel. Angelo Fazio v. Honorable Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New York
348 F.2d 418 (Second Circuit, 1965)
United States ex rel. Fazio v. Fay
236 F. Supp. 211 (S.D. New York, 1964)