People v. Fayton
This text of 4 A.D.3d 143 (People v. Fayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Cataldo, J.), rendered February 13, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees and unlawful wearing of a body vest, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 10 years, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s claim that he was deprived of his right to a speedy trial is unreviewable because he has not provided minutes that would be dispositive of the issue (see People v Olivo, 52 NY2d 309, 320 [1981]; People v Kramer, 181 AD2d 449 [1992], lv denied 79 NY2d 949 [1992]; see also People v Notholt, 242 AD2d 251, 253 [1997]).
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s request for an adjournment to locate a defense witness. Defendant failed to satisfy the criteria set forth in People v Foy (32 NY2d 473 [1973]), and the proposed testimony was of such limited exculpatory value that its absence could not have impaired defendant’s right to present a defense.
Defendant’s application to preclude the People from filing a responding brief is denied. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 A.D.3d 143, 771 N.Y.S.2d 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fayton-nyappdiv-2004.