People v. Faust

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Faust

131 A.D.2d 873, 517 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48306

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 A.D.2d 873 (People v. Faust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Faust, 131 A.D.2d 873, 517 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48306 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.), rendered April 25, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts) and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The determination by the hearing court that the defendant voluntarily consented to a search of his home by the police was amply supported by the evidence adduced at the suppression hearing (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759).

We find, moreover, that in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, the trial court did not commit reversible error in admitting certain testimony which was largely cumulative. Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Fiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.), rendered April 25, 1984, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts) and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The determination by the hearing court that the defendant voluntarily consented to a search of his home by the police was amply supported by the evidence adduced at the suppression hearing (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759).

We find, moreover, that in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, the trial court did not commit reversible error in admitting certain testimony which was largely cumulative. Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Fiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A.D.2d 873, 517 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-faust-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack