People v. Fauntleroy
Opinion
People v Fauntleroy (2025 NY Slip Op 04105)
| People v Fauntleroy |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 04105 |
| Decided on July 9, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 9, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LINDA CHRISTOPHER
BARRY E. WARHIT
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.
1996-10107
(Ind. No. 9504/95)
v
Kareem Fauntleroy, appellant.
Kareem Fauntleroy, Attica, NY, appellant pro se.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Julian Joiris, and Nicole Leibow of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 22, 1999 (People v Fauntleroy, 258 AD2d 664), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 15, 1996.
ORDERED that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
DILLON, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, WARHIT and WAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2025 NY Slip Op 04105 (People v. Fauntleroy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.