People v. Fata
This text of 220 A.D.3d 886 (People v. Fata) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Fata |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 05271 |
| Decided on October 18, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on October 18, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
WILLIAM G. FORD
HELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ.
2022-08996
(Ind. No. 70042/22)
v
Malik Fata, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Joshua M. Levine of counsel), for appellant.
Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Thomas B. Litsky of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Lisa Grey, J.), imposed October 13, 2022, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).
BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, FORD and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Acting Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
220 A.D.3d 886, 196 N.Y.S.3d 571, 2023 NY Slip Op 05271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fata-nyappdiv-2023.