People v. Fashaw

2017 NY Slip Op 2058
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 22, 2017
Docket2011-03104
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2058 (People v. Fashaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fashaw, 2017 NY Slip Op 2058 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

People v Fashaw (2017 NY Slip Op 02058)
People v Fashaw
2017 NY Slip Op 02058
Decided on March 22, 2017
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 22, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
HECTOR D. LASALLE
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2011-03104
(Ind. No. 1760/10)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Kashawn Fashaw, appellant.


Matthew Muraskin, Port Jefferson, NY, for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Michael J. Brennan of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), rendered March 16, 2011, convicting him of assault in the second degree and resisting arrest, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Salgado, 111 AD3d 859; People v Nugent, 109 AD3d 625; People v Gheradi, 68 AD3d 892, 893; People v Boustani, 300 AD2d 313, 314).

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137; People v Brown, 135 AD3d 870).

Although the defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal does not preclude review of his remaining contentions, those contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to reach them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

CHAMBERS, J.P., ROMAN, LASALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
People v. Benevento
697 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Brown
135 A.D.3d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Gheradi
68 A.D.3d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Nugent
109 A.D.3d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Salgado
111 A.D.3d 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Boustani
300 A.D.2d 313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 2058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fashaw-nyappdiv-2017.