People v. Farrington

14 Johns. 348
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1817·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

The language of this order is too indefinite •„ whether Myers’ bills or M‘Kean’s bills are money, or goods, is wholly uncertain. We are of opinion, that it is not an order for the payment of money, nor for the delivery of goods. The prisoner must, therefore, be discharged.

Prisoner discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Farrington, 14 Johns. 348 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1817).

14 Johns. 348 (People v. Farrington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . Rising
100 N.E. 694 (New York Court of Appeals, 1912)